requestId:68753c22904ac1.68399983.
Re-review of the volume of “Shangshu” in the Han Dynasty and the Modern Chinese Literature
Author: Sun Siwang (Associate Research Institute of Yuelu Book Academy, Hunan University. The purpose of the study is Chinese history and modern Chinese history)
Source: “New School” 13th Edition
The first fortress to be occupied by the source of “Shangshu” is the original appearance and volume analysis of the two departments of the Han Dynasty and the modern Chinese Literature. This problem is not clear, and the history of “Shangshu” is difficult to obtain a clear and reliable sorting. At most, since the Qing Dynasty, scholars can use data base differences, but the judgments made by 官网 are almost all the same, and have gathered together to this day. That is, from several common academic history works in recent years (such as Liu Qi’s “History of Shang Books”, Cheng Yuanmin’s “History of Shang Books”, and Ma Shilong’s “Two Hans “Shang Books” Research and ResearchBaozhuang“), several suggestions on this problem also have poor principles. If you can discuss the problem of the surround and not focus, please try to examine it as follows.
1The relationship between “Tai Yi” and the ancient and modern text “Shang Shu”
Fu Sheng’s “Shang Shu” teaching book does not include the “Tai Yi” chapter. The academic community has basically reached a common understanding. Liu Qiyan, Cheng Yuanmin and Ma Shifen all have detailed examination certificates, no comments are required. Fu Sheng, who was taught “Shangshu”, was from Jinan and was born around the 55th year of King Nan of Zhou (260 BC). At that time, the Qin Dynasty pursued the strategy of remote and close attacks. The country is far away from the east, and he is willing to serve Qin and get peace. By the time the Qin soldiers attacked the Qi Kingdom without bloodshed, Fu Sheng was already in his forties. After Qin completed the sanction, Fu Sheng went to the court to become a doctor, but was burned by the emperor to ban books, so he sealed all the private “Shangshu” in the wall of his former residence. After Han Zheng decided to do so, Fu Sheng only completed twenty-eight chapters (after detailed) and the rest of the lost chapters (such as “Tai Yu”) recorded only a few words, so he gave the course materials and translated them into the book “Shang Shu Da Chuan”. “Shangshuo” is similar to listening lesson notes and is compiled by the general editor of Fushengmen Shengxiong. From the parallel lines of his life, we can infer that Fu Sheng was both connected with the six nationalities and the writings between Qin and Han. The “Shang Shu” he enfeoffed was written in “ancient text”, but when Han was first taught between Qilu, the “Shang Shu” written by his door-to-door master had changed to “modern text”.
Fusheng taught “Shangshu” in Qilu, and the learners of Han “can speak “Shangshu” as a result”, and later “all the great masters in Shandong did not involve “Shangshu” to teach them.” The famous people of Fushengmen include the Jinnan Zhangsheng, Qiancheng (now Gaoqing, Shandong) Eurosheng, and the Taichang official Chao Empress who was sent by the court to learn from Emperor Wen. The originals expressed by Zhang Sheng, Euro Yang Sheng and Chao III are born with self-rescue, so none of the threeBaobao. “Taisho”. This generation of students has been studying for a long time. The ancient Kongbi text appeared between Emperor Jing and Emperor Wu.
The problem is that can the ancient text of Kongbi “Shangshu” include the “Taisho” chapter? Qu Wanli, Cheng Yuanmin, and Ma The teachers and teachers of Shiyuan all regard it as “no”. The relevant recommendations of Mr. Ma Shiyuan were mainly influenced by Mr. Cheng Yuanmin. Mr. Cheng Yuanmin had carefully sorted out the origin of “Taiyu” and recognized Kong Bi’s ancient text “Shang Shu”, which is the 46 volumes of the ancient text of “Shang Shu” written in “Han Shu·Article”, which is not the case. The teacher, Mr. Qu Wanli, of Cheng’s teacher, has a little bit of the argument. Qi, he believed that the ancient text of Kongbi “Shang Shu” does not have “Tai Yu”, but the ancient text of “Shang Shu” contains “Tai Yu”. Judging from Qu’s related statements, the ancient text of “Shang Shu” is not purely Kongbi’s ancient text, but the “Last-Gradu” added to the latter’s basics. In any case, the three teachers and teachers of Qu, Cheng and Ma all believed that the ancient text of Kongbi did not have “Tai Yu”.
Zhang Xitang, Jian Jian and Liu Qiyan asked the teacher of the teacher of “existence”. But the “existence” mentioned by the three is not a judgment of the unified nature. The initiative of the teacher of the teacher of the teacher of Zhang Xitang has slightly changed. In his words reflecting his contemplation in his late years, he abandoned the “Liu Xin’s ancient text of building the Kong Wall” held in his late years, and turned it into a presumption that the Kong Wall Book is the book obtained by Kong Anguo. “The ancient text of Kongbi was the beginning of Emperor Jing of Han.” Zhang’s classical discussion of the “Tai Yi” was from his late years that he believed that the “Tai Yi” version “should have four systems”, and the ancient text of Kongbi “Shang Shu” originally contained the ancient text of Kongbi. At most, the teaching of Guardian, the chief teacher of Guardian, was still on the stage of academic standing for “Liu Xin’s ancient text of building Kongbi” by Liu Xin’s ancient text, and his “Han Dynasty Today” The “Taisho” is included in the “Taisho” in the ancient texts of Kongbi, but the actual view that this treatment is to express is that when Liu Xin built the ancient texts of Kongbi, he entered the “Later-departed” common “Taisho” when Liu Xin built the ancient text of Kongbi “Shangsho”. Liu started to write “Guanmen” and “Yuansho”, as “Yuansho”, as “Yuansho”, he made some level of modification to Master Nai’s statement, and believed that Liu Xin had supplemented the perfect Kongbi book. Although things are not believed, the ancient Chinese text “Shang Shu” included in this story, also known as the ancient Kongbi “Shang Shu”, is a complete and entrusted book from the pre-Qin period. There will be no “later” “Tai Yu” in the book “The Works of Ming Dynasty” in “The Ming Dynasty”. The problem is that the comparison table of the Hundred Chapters of the “Preface to the Book” by him, still places “Tai Yu” in the “Central Secret Kong Wall Version” five List of eighteen chapters. Liu did not give a special explanation about the differences between the statement and the table.
Since the publication of “Liu Xiangxin’s Year of the Father and Son”, the statement “Liu Xin’s Creation of Ancient Texts” by Kang Youjin and others has been basically clarified. As for the ancient texts of Kong Bi, there is no “Tai Yu”, it is the most realistic statement of “Zhang Xitang’s Teacher Zhang Xitang”.Come on, we will analyze the key points of relevant recommendations based on a brief analysis, and then sort out the origin of “Taiyu”.
The ancient text of the Kongbi is not “Tai Yu”, and the assessment can be conducted based on the reference system of the two differences. The first reference system is a description made by Ban Gu based on the twenty-nine chapters of the current text as a comparison object. “Han Shu·Faiwenzhi” says that Kong Anguo’s ancient Chinese essay “Shang Shu” “to examine twenty-nine chapters, he will get sixteen more chapters.” I know all the sixteen additional chapters, and I don’t care about the “Taiyu”. I think it’s important to see how to understand the “Twenty-Nine Chapters”. The person who studied in ancient times was “Twenty-nine chapters of the world”, which is the twenty-nine chapters of the current text that included “Tai Yi”. Kong Guangda’s opinions are similar to those of the Yang family, and it is clearly stated that these “twenty-nine chapters” are combined with the “Taiyu” of Fusheng’s twenty-eight chapters and “later-obtained”. By this reversal, the “Shang Shu” mentioned by Ban Gu, which includes the ancient text “Tai Yu” corresponding to the “Tai Yu” in the same article as the “Tai Yu”. The important reason for the teacher Qu Wanli, Cheng Yuanmin and Ma Shichang was the chief instructor of “Shang Shu Kong Ji Jing Zheng”, which also used the reference system of Ban Gu. The problem is that Wang Xiansu’s presumption of the forty-five volumes and fifty-eight chapters of the ancient Confucius Book of Shangshu actually had a very clear internal contradiction. He believed that the TC:
發佈留言